Version 0.3.3 (current)
\033[2J\033[H) in addition to the form-feed character, so
the screen is cleared correctly when R is run from a macOS or Linux
terminal as well as inside RStudio. A new clear_screen
parameter on RCMapMenu() (default TRUE) allows
users to disable screen clearing:
RCMapMenu(clear_screen = FALSE).Version 0.3.2
Version 0.3.1
StatementSummaryNN.csv file now includes a
ClusterName column as its last column, showing the
user-assigned cluster name for every statement row in addition to the
ClusterNo integer."Health-Education"
instead of "2-1"). When no names have been assigned the
cluster index is used as before.Version 0.3.0
config.txt). On first load RCMap automatically
creates a config.txt file in the project folder containing
all tunable settings with their defaults and descriptions. If the file
already exists only missing settings are appended; existing
user-specified values are never overwritten. See the Project Configuration File section for the
complete list of settings.config.txt and stored in the session, making
analyses fully reproducible and customisable without code changes.Version 0.2.x
RCMap is an open-source concept mapping software, implemented in R (R Core Team 2025). It provides a menu-driven user interface to guide users through the concept mapping analytical process (Trochim and McLinden 2017).
This document provides information on the required format of the input data, the installation process, and the graphical and analytical capabilities of RCMap.
RCMap (Bar and Mentch 2017) is user-friendly and does not require any programming experience. It can be used to generate cluster maps, point rating, cluster rating maps, pattern matching, go-zone plots, as well as several other types of plots. It can also be used to generate detailed reports with statistical analyses. Windows users can generate Windows Metafile formatted plots which can be edited in Microsoft Word and PowerPoint, in order to manually adjust various features to achieve the best visual results. Details about the plots, reports, and features appear in the sections below.
The RCMap homepage is https://github.com/haimbar/RCMap . For questions, comments, and suggestions, please contact Haim Bar.
To cite RCMap, use
Bar, Haim, and Lucas Mentch. 2017. “RCmap, an
Open-Source Software for Concept Mapping.” Evaluation and Program
Planning 60: 284-92. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.018 and to cite the
latest version of the package with BibTeX, use citation(“RCMap”)
@Manual{,
title = {RCMap: Group Concept Mapping},
author = {Haim Bar},
year = {2026},
note = {R package version 0.3.3},
}
To use RCMap, you must first install R (version >= 4.0.0) (R Core Team 2025) which is available from https://www.r-project.org/ .
RCMap requires the following packages:
Follow the installation instructions for R, and start R (from version > 0.1.x it is no longer required to use RStudio - any integrated development environment, or IDE, or even a simple command line shell will do.) From the R console install the RCMap library. It will install the required libraries. You can do it by cloning the GitHub repo and building the package on your computer, or by using the install_github function (for which you will have to install the devtools package, first.)
devtools::install_github("haimbar/RCMap")
To start RCMap, type the following in the R console.
library(RCMap)
RCMapMenu()
It will show the top-level menu of the package:
RCMap command-line interface.
Top-level menu
1: Choose the data folder
2: summary
3: Settings
4: Plots
5: Reports
6: Analysis
7: R prompt
Selection:
The menu choices are described in subsequent sections.
A graphical user interface via a browser is not currently available. The menu-driven approach in recent versions of RCMap has the advantage that the user can use built-in options and functions through an intuitive interface, but can also get back to the R prompt and perform any additional operations (for example, creating new variables, plots, or analyses.) This also allows greater flexibility in saving results. For example, plots can be saved to a file using the user’s preferred size, and in any format supported by R (pdf, png, jpeg, svg, eps, TIFF, bmp, and on Windows - wmf.)
The input data has to be in four CSV (comma separated values) files. Note that the file and column names below are all case-sensitive. An example is provided with the RCMap software for reference.
config.txt).Most common data-entry problems occur because of one of the following reasons:
When a new project is loaded, RCMap checks for any possible issues with the data and provides warning or error messages. See more in the Troubleshooting section. RCMap Menu Options —————
Choosing this item in the main menu will open a file manager program, with which the user will select the folder where the four project’s input files are found.
The first time the project directory is selected, RCMap will take a few moments to read the data and preprocess it. If the project in the selected directory has already been opened, you should see the following:
RCMap command-line interface.
Opening project folder:XXXX/...
A previous project file was found.
Hit Enter to use saved project, or enter L to load the project from raw files:
RCMap saves your selections (such as the number of clusters, cluster names, etc.) so if you want to pick up where you left off, hit Enter. If you want to reload the data from the original files (for example, if you made updates to the data files), then you should enter L.
RCMap will attempt to read the files and create the RCMap dataset. If any errors are encountered, RCMap will show an error message in the console. It will also print any issues concerning the pile sorting data. The possible warnings are
These issues can also be seen via the Summary menu item. See more in the Troubleshooting section.
For example:
RCMap command-line interface.
Data folder: C:/Project/
Number of sorters: 74
Number of statements: 81
Issues:
Sorter 1 put more than a third of the cards in one pile.
Sorter 4 put more than a third of the cards in one pile.
Sorter 7 did not sort card(s) 56,57,59,61,62,63,64,66,67,68,69,70,72,73,75,76,77,78,79,80,81
...[Truncated]
1: Perform split-half analysis
2: Perform leave-one-out analysis
3: Main menu
Selection:
The Summary top-menu item has three submenu options. By choosing 1, the user can perform a split-half analysis (see below). Option 2 gives a leave-one out analysus (see details below). Choosing 3 (or 0) takes the user back to the top menu.
In order to draw conclusions about stakeholder sorting from the 2-D map we must have an estimate of how reliable or consistent the map is. This is done by checking how much the map varies when we use random subsamples from the set of sorters.
In one such method which is called ‘split-half’, the sorters are split into two groups, we obtain the 2-D maps for each group and check the correlation between them. A high degree of correlation suggests that the map is reliable and consistent. When concept mapping was first introduced, performing the MDS step was computationally difficult and time consuming, but nowadays this computation is feasible, and we can consider a large sample of split-half partitions. Calculating and averaging all split-half reliabilities is equivalent under some conditions to calculating Cronbach’s alpha (Cho and Chun 2018). This approach is similar to the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) proposed in (Borgatti 2002). Whereas (Borgatti 2002) considers QAP for detecting differences between known subgroups of sorters, the same method can be used to determine map consistency – if the distances obtained from random assignments into two groups are highly correlated, then the map can be considered reliable and not sensitive to the subsample selection.
We divide the set of sorters into two subsets, perform MDS on each half, and obtain the 2-D distance matrix for each half. We then calculate the correlation between the distance matrices. This is repeated 20 times, and we report the mean correlation coefficient, and provide a plot with all 20 correlation coefficients.
Mean correlation between split halves: 0.64 (using 20 random splits, distance= Euclidean)
The mean correlation between the split halves (using 20 random splits) is quite high, which suggests good reliability.
The clustering is performed on the two-dimensional map obtained from the multidimensional scaling. When high-dimensional data are projcted to a lower dimension, the (scaled) distances between pairs of points may be quite different than they are in the original space. The important question with regard to clustering is whether the multidimensional scaling process affects the clustering. One global measure that is often used is the stress. However, it does not tell us what the impact on the clustering is, or which clusters are affected.
Furthermore, it may be that some sorters have a large impact on the final MDS map. The stress measure, or the split-half analysis do not tell us whether such sorters exist, or what impact individual sorters have on the final map.
To provide an answer to these questions, we perform a leave-one-out analysis. If there are M sorters, we perform the MDS step M+1 times: once with all the sorters, and then M more times, each time leaving one sorter out. For each of these M+1 MDS plots, we obtain the clustering for k=2,…,N/4 clusters, where N is the total number of statements. Then, we calculate the Jaccard index for each k, and for each of the M leave-one-out clusterings. The Jaccard index is defined as \[J=\frac{TP}{TP + FP + FN},\] where TP is the number of pairs of points that are placed in the same cluster when using all the data, as well as when leaving one sorter out. FP is the number of pairs that are placed in the same cluster when leaving one out but in different clusters when using all the data. Similarly, FN is the number of pairs that are placed in the same cluster when using all the sorters but in different clusters when leaving one sorter out.
The Jaccard index takes values between 0 (no agreement between two clusterings) and 1 (the same clusters were obtained by the two methods.) The following plot shows an example of such leave-one-out analysis:
The grey lines in this plot are the Jaccard index values (vertical axis) for each statement, for each number of clusters (horizontal axis.) The dark black line is the median Jaccard index, and the two blue lines are the first and third quartiles.
What we can see in this example is that the median is maximized when 9 clusters are used. The upper and lower quartiles are also close to their maximum value for k=9, which suggests that nine clusters may give us the most reliable clusters. We can also see that some statements become almost perfectly placed once we get to k=8, but after k=18 the Jaccard index drops. We also see that a couple of statements get consistent low scores, suggesting that there was at least one sorter who sorted these statements very differently than the consensus.
We say more about this later.
This menu option has six choices:
RCMap command-line interface.
Settings
1: Choose the distance metric
2: Choose the number of clusters
3: Set cluster names
4: Choose color scheme
5: Edit pile label canonical names
6: Main menu
Selection:
config.txt (see Project
Configuration File).
config.txt.
config.txt.
Here is an example of the menu option for cluster name
selection. Here, the number of clusters (11) was selected by minimizing
the within-cluster sums of squares. It includes the top labels, and
extracts some suggested cluster names. For example, based on
sorter-provided labels, four of the top five suggestions include
collaboration or community. The output has been truncated for
brevity.
RCMap command-line interface.
Select cluster number (or 0 to return to the main menu)
1: 1 2: 2 3: 3 4: 4 5: 5 6: 6 7: 7 8: 8 9: 9
10: 10 11: 11
Selection: 3
3 [ 3 ]
Statements in the cluster
Institutional collaboration and commitment to clinical...
Number and types of CTSA Hub interactions with state...
Number and types of new or ongoing collaborations with...
Number, type, duration, and quality of Hub-supported community...
Number and types of collaborative research projects and collaborators...
Number and types of Hub collaborations with community members...
...[Truncated]
Suggested names
collaboration
community engagement
community
team science
partnerships
Enter a name [ 3 ]
1:
The first time a project folder is loaded, RCMap automatically
creates a plain-text file called
config.txt in that folder. The file lists
every tunable setting with its current value and a short description. On
subsequent loads, any settings already in the file are read and applied;
any settings that are missing are appended with their default values.
This means you can freely add, remove, or edit lines in the file between
sessions — RCMap will never overwrite values you have set.
| Setting | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
ratingscale
|
5
|
Number of Likert scale points (e.g. 5 or 7). |
clust_method
|
ward.D2
|
Hierarchical clustering method passed to hclust. Options:
ward.D2, ward.D, single,
complete, average, mcquitty,
median, centroid.
|
dist_metric
|
Euclidean
|
Initial distance metric for clustering and plots. Options:
Euclidean, Hyperbolic.
|
color_scheme
|
rcmap
|
Initial color scheme for cluster plots. Options: rcmap,
rainbow.
|
n_clusters
|
3
|
Starting number of clusters (can be changed interactively in Settings). |
mds_seed
|
154204
|
Random seed for the tiny jitter applied to the MDS distance matrix to break ties. Change this only if you need to verify that results are not seed-dependent. |
splithalf_seed
|
23456
|
Random seed for the split-half reliability analysis. |
splithalf_B
|
20
|
Number of random splits used in the split-half reliability analysis. |
fuzzy_label_threshold
|
0.15
|
Jaro-Winkler distance threshold for fuzzy pile label matching. Values closer to 0 require labels to be nearly identical to be merged; values closer to 1 are more aggressive. A value of 0.15 catches most typos and abbreviations while keeping clearly distinct labels separate. |
jaccard_threshold
|
0.3
|
Jaccard index values below this threshold are considered “unstable” in the leave-one-out stability plot. Statements with consistently low Jaccard values may be misplaced in the 2-D map. |
A typical config.txt looks like this:
# RCMap project configuration file
# Edit the values below to override defaults.
# ratingscale: number of Likert scale points (e.g. 5, 7)
ratingscale=5
# clust_method: hierarchical clustering method (...)
clust_method=ward.D2
# dist_metric: initial distance metric for plots (Euclidean, Hyperbolic)
dist_metric=Euclidean
# color_scheme: initial color scheme for plots (rcmap, rainbow)
color_scheme=rcmap
# n_clusters: initial number of clusters
n_clusters=3
# mds_seed: random seed for MDS distance-matrix jitter (reproducibility)
mds_seed=154204
# splithalf_seed: random seed for split-half reliability analysis
splithalf_seed=23456
# splithalf_B: number of split-half replications
splithalf_B=20
# fuzzy_label_threshold: Jaro-Winkler distance threshold for pile label
# fuzzy matching (0-1, lower = stricter)
fuzzy_label_threshold=0.15
# jaccard_threshold: Jaccard index values below this are flagged as unstable
jaccard_threshold=0.3
Lines starting with # are comments and are ignored.
Values set interactively (such as the number of clusters or cluster
names) are saved to CMapSession.RData and restored on the
next load; they take precedence over the values in
config.txt.
The plots menu option gives the following submenu:
RCMap command-line interface.
Plots
1: Point map (MDS) 2: Clusters (rays)
3: Clusters (polygons) 4: Dendrogram
5: Phylogenic tree 6: Misplacement
7: Statement Rating (Map) 8: Statement Rating (Dot chart)
9: Cluster Rating (Map) 10: Cluster Rating (Bar chart)
11: Parallel Coordinates 12: GoZone
13: Main menu
Selection:
Displays the two-dimensional representation of the distances between statements, as obtained from the MDS (multi-dimensional scaling) algorithm. Statements are labeled on the plot using their number.
The Clusters option displays the two-dimensional MDS plot, with points grouped into clusters. The number of clusters is determined by the user in the Settings menu option. There are two types of cluster display - Rays, where each point in a cluster is connected to the cluster’s center; and Polygons, where clusters appear as convex polygons, with smooth corners. The default cluster names are number 1,…,k where k is the selected number of clusters. However, the user can choose more descriptive cluster names via the Settings menu. Here, we show just the polygon view, and with cluster 3 named “Collaboration”.
Following the MDS step, a hierarchical clustering is performed on the two-dimensional representation of the data. In the process, components (statements, or sets of statements) are joined iteratively with their nearest neighbor. The nearest neighbor may be another statement, or a group of statements which were joined into one group in a previous iteration. A dendrogram depicts the hierarchical clustering process. “Leaves” in this binary-tree diagram correspond to the statements, and branches represent the nearest neighbor connections made in each iteration. The length of an edge in a dendrogram is a function of the dis-similarity between joined components. The clusters can also be shown phylogenic trees. Both plots allow users to manually select the preferred number of clusters, based on the lengths of the stems in the tree. The phylogenic tree is more convenient when the number of statements is large, in which case a dendrogram may be too wide for a page. Here, we demonstrate just the dendrogram, with 11 clusters.
Based on the user’s choice of a distance metric, RCMap calculates a ‘misplacement index’. The index is a number between 0 and 1. A small value is assigned to a point which is placed well in the 2-D map in the sense that it appears close in the 2-D map to points to which it was also close in the original space, and it appears far from points which were also far from it in the original space. In other words, a small value corresponds to a point which was projected to the 2-D space so as to preserve its relative distances with the other points. A value close to 1 means that the point’s representation in the MDS plot distorts its position (relative to the other points) in the original space.
The index is based on the Jaccard index, which we described above in the ‘Perform leave-one-out analysis’ section. Recall that the Jaccard index of a statement is close to 1 if it is placed in the same cluster with high probability in the leave-one-out process. The misplacement for a given clustering configuration is calculated as the proportion of times that the Jaccard index falls below a certain threshold. A higher value indicates a misplaced point in the 2-D point.
The following figure shows the MDS plot, and the radius of each point corresponds to its misplacement index value. This helps to identify potential ‘bridges’ – statements with a large radius which indicate that they were placed on the 2-D map close to points with which they were rarely sorted together, or far from statements with which they were sorted often.
For example, point 41 (in cluster #10) has a relatively large value, suggesting that it may not be a good fit for the cluster, in the sense that some sorters put it with statements other than the ones in the same cluster (20, 23, 29, 37, 74, and 81).
In contrast, the collaboration cluster (with statement 7 close to its center) has very low values of the misplacement index, suggesting that this cluster represents the high-dimensional data rather faithfully.
After selecting one of the statement rating options the user is prompted to provide a cohort and a rating variable. If a map view is selected, the average ratings of statements for that variable in the selected cohort is shown on the point-map, with point-size proportional to the average rating. The second option is a dot-chart, where the points are shown on a 1-5 scale by cluster, and within each cluster they are shown in increasing rating order (from bottom to top). The dot-chart is useful in identifying statements which rank high or low in one of the rating variables, and to see which clusters contain statements. For example, in the following dot chart it can be seen that cluster 10 consists of statements which are considered less feasible by the raters.
1: allRaters
2: X1_Administrator
3: X1_Community.Partner
4: X1_Evaluator
5: X1_KL2.PI
6: X1_NCATS.Staff
7: X1_Other..please.specify.below..
8: X1_Other.CTSA.Hub.Staff
9: X1_TL1.PI
10: X1_UL1.PI
11: X2___
12: X2_L
13: X2_M
14: X2_S
Selection: 1
Rating variable
1: Importance
2: Feasibility
Selection:
The dot-chart below shows the feasibility ratings by cluster. Overall, there is not a big difference between clusters, but cluster 11 is rated as less feasible than the others. The dot-chart also shows that there are some statements in cluster 10 which are rated as more feasible than some statements in other clusters, and vice versa. This suggests that while cluster 10 may be considered less feasible overall, it still contains some statements which are considered more feasible than some statements in other clusters. Among the most feasibls clusters are dissemination (cluster 2) and training (cluster 7).
Similar to the statement rating plots, but the average ratings are calcualated at the cluster level. The bar chart view shows the average rating per cluster for the selected cohort and variable. The bar plot also includes ‘whiskers’ corresponding to the standard error of the mean.
There are two options to sort the bars in the plot – alphabetically, or by height. Below, we demonstrate the latter, and we can see that cluster 7 is the least important, while cluster “training” (2) is the most important.
It is possible to compare average cluster ratings by cohort and rating variables by using a parallel coordinate plot (also known in the concept mapping literature as pattern matching). In this version of RCMap it is possible to use more that two cohort/rating variable combinations. For example, the following figure shows the relationships between feasibility and importance. Although cluster 9 is rated as the most feasible, it is also rated as the least important. Cluster 7 is rated as the least important, but it is not rated as the least feasible. Cluster 2 (training) is rated as the most important, and it is also rated as one of the most feasible clusters.
It is possible for example to visualize how clusters are rated in terms of feasibility by engineers vs. how they are rated in terms of importance by managers.
A bivariate plot is used to show the rating of the statements based on combinations of a rating variable and a cohort. Each statement is represented by a point, allowing to see very easily how points are evaluated by users on both axes, simultaneously. For example, if the variables are Importance and Feasibility, points in the upper-right corner are considered highly important and also very feasible. Each point is also colored by the cluster to which it belongs, allowing to see which clusters rate higher on each dimension. The plot is divided into quadrants, defined by the overall mean ratings along each axis.
In the following example we see a general positive correlation between importance and feasibility, but there are some statements which are rated as more important than feasible (points above the diagonal), and some statements which are rated as more feasible than important (points below the diagonal). Cluster 9 is rated as the most feasible, but it is not rated as the most important. Cluster 7 is rated as the least important, but it is not rated as the least feasible. Cluster 2 (training) is rated as the most important, and it is also rated as one of the most feasible clusters.
Statement 39 is rated as the least important, but it is rated as very feasible. Statement 67 is rated as both highly important and highly feasible.
Choosing the Reports item from the top-menu gives the following submenu:
RCMap command-line interface.
Report
1: Sorters
2: Raters
3: Statements
4: Main menu
Selection:
The Sorters report shows for each sorter the number of statements sorted, and the number of piles to which they were placed. Note that some sorters may leave some cards unsorted.
Sorter 1 sorted 81 cards into 3 piles
Sorter 2 sorted 76 cards into 16 piles
Sorter 3 sorted 76 cards into 14 piles
Sorter 4 sorted 81 cards into 6 piles
Sorter 5 sorted 64 cards into 13 piles
Sorter 6 sorted 41 cards into 13 piles
Sorter 7 sorted 60 cards into 3 piles
...Truncated
Press any key to continue.
The raters summary contains summary statistics from the rater demographics file. For categorical variables the report includes the total count for each factor level, and for a quantitative variable it shows the five number summary (minimum, the three quartiles and the maximum), as well as the mean. For example:
PrimaryRole size
Evaluator :46 __:10
Other CTSA Hub Staff :15 L :26
Administrator :14 M :17
NCATS Staff :10 S :48
Other (please specify below):: 9
TL1 PI : 3
(Other) : 4
Press any key to continue.
The statement summary is saved to a file called ‘output/StatementSummaryNN.csv’ where NN is the selected number of clusters. The file contains the statements, their IDs, the cluster to which they belong, and for each rating variable it contains the number of raters, the mean, the standard deviation, the minimum and the maximum. The file is arranged by clusters and the summary statistics for each cluster are also included. The file can be viewed with Excel.
Because RCMap runs from R’s command line interface, it can be used to perform any statistical method available in R to analyze the ratings. There are two types of analysis that are included in the RCMap analysis menu. The first one is Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine whether there are different average ratings in different clusters, and the other one is Tukey’s method to perform all pairwise comparisons between clusters. Choosing the Analysis item from the top menu gives the following:
RCMap command-line interface.
Analysis
1: Between-cluster ANOVA
2: Tukey - all cluster pairs
3: Main menu
Selection:
ANOVA (analysis of variance) is used to test whether all the clusters have the same mean rating or not. A small p-value indicates that at least one cluster has a mean rating which is significantly different. Here is an example of the output from an ANOVA model:
Analysis of Variance: Response= Importance
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Cluster 10 350 35.03 28.43 <2e-16 ***
Residuals 7858 9682 1.23
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
312 observations deleted due to missingness
________________________________________________________________________________
Analysis of Variance: Response= Feasibility
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Cluster 10 778 77.83 63.05 <2e-16 ***
Residuals 7913 9768 1.23
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
257 observations deleted due to missingness
________________________________________________________________________________
The results are displayed on the screen, and are also saved in a file in the output folder in the project’s directory. The file name is output/ANOVAnn.txt where nn is the selected number of clusters. In this example we see that the 11 clusters have different importance ratings, as well as different feasibility ratings.
Tukey’s method allows to perform pairwise comparison between all possible pairs, while controlling the overall pobability of Type I error. A partial output from Tukey’s method is provided here below, and it can be seen that clusters training, collaboration, dissemination, and services are significantly more feasible that impact, but cluster dei is not.
Analysis of Variance: Response= Feasibility
Tukey multiple comparisons of means
95% family-wise confidence level
Fit: aov(formula = ratings[, i] ~ Cluster)
$Cluster
diff lwr upr p adj
training-impact 0.545255943 0.3523789981 0.738132888 0.0000000
collaboration-impact 0.202791367 0.0207005476 0.384882186 0.0149732
dissemination-impact 0.566281645 0.3878987080 0.744664581 0.0000000
services-impact 0.500786216 0.3184719789 0.683100452 0.0000000
dei-impact 0.121085155 -0.0657292039 0.307899514 0.5868729
The results are saved in a file in the output folder in the project’s directory. The file name is output/TukeyNN.txt where NN is the selected number of clusters.
To quit the program, return to the top-level menu, and select option 7, to get back to the R prompt. You can restart RCMap by running RCMapMenu() again, and continue the analysis. You can use the save.image() function in R in order to save the project analysis in case you plan to resume the analysis at a later time, after you have quit R.
This section describes the errors and warnings that RCMap may report, their most common causes, and how to resolve them.
These messages appear in red, and halt data loading. After reading the message, press Enter to return to the main menu, correct the problem in your CSV files, and reload the project.
Missing required file(s) in '<folder>': ...
One or more of the four required CSV files
(Statements.csv, SortedCards.csv,
Ratings.csv, Demographics.csv) is absent from
the selected project folder. Check that the folder you selected is the
correct one and that all four files are present with exactly these names
(case-sensitive).
'Statements.csv' appears empty or malformed.
The file could not be parsed as a two-column CSV. Make sure it has a
header row with StatementID and Statement
columns, and that each subsequent row contains an integer ID and the
statement text.
StatementID column must be numeric. /
Duplicate StatementID values found.
Every row in Statements.csv must have a unique integer
in the StatementID column. Non-numeric values (e.g. blank
cells, letters) and duplicated IDs are both rejected. Statement IDs do
not need to be consecutive but must be unique.
SortedCards.csv references card ID(s) not present in Statements.csv
A card number that appears in SortedCards.csv has no
matching entry in Statements.csv. This usually means a
statement was added or removed from one file but not the other, or that
the ID was mistyped. Align the IDs across both files.
Problems in 'SortedCards.csv' / 'Ratings.csv' / 'Demographics.csv': ...
The named file is missing a required column, has the wrong number of
columns, or contains unexpected data. The message includes a short
description of the specific issue. Run
print_input_checklist() at the R prompt for a full
description of the expected column layout of each file.
Ratings column '<name>' contains non-numeric values.
/
Ratings column '<name>' contains values outside 1..<scale>.
All rating columns in Ratings.csv must contain integers
in the range 1 to ratingscale (default 5,
configurable in config.txt). Blank cells, text, or
out-of-range numbers will trigger this error. Fill in or remove the
offending rows.
'Weights.csv' has N row(s) but there are M sorter(s).
/
Weight column contains missing or non-numeric values.
/
Weight column must contain strictly positive values.
If a Weights.csv file is present in the project folder
it must have exactly one row per sorter, a column named
Weight, and all positive numeric values. Remove the file to
use equal weights, or correct the row count and values.
Error loading project: ...
A general catch-all shown when an unexpected R error occurs during
data loading. The original R error message is shown after the colon. If
the cause is not immediately clear, check that none of your CSV files
are open in Excel (which locks the file on Windows) and that the
encoding matches the enc argument passed to
RCMapMenu() (default UTF-8).
These messages appear in yellow. The analysis continues after you press Enter, but you should review the warning to decide whether the data need correction.
Warning: Rater <ID> appears in Ratings.csv but not in Demographics.csv
A rater submitted ratings but has no row in
Demographics.csv. Their ratings are included in the overall
analysis, but they cannot be assigned to any cohort and will not appear
in cohort-specific reports. If this rater should be in a cohort, add
their demographic information to Demographics.csv.
Warning: N rater(s) in Demographics.csv have no rating data and will be excluded: <IDs>
One or more raters listed in Demographics.csv have no
corresponding rows in Ratings.csv. They are automatically
dropped from the analysis. If ratings were expected from these raters,
check whether their RaterID values match between the two
files.
Note: The following pile labels were merged based on similarity: {label1, label2} -> 'canonical'
During data loading, the fuzzy label matching step detected pile
labels that are typographically similar (e.g. “Health”, “helath”,
“hlth”) and merged them into a single canonical label. Review the list
to confirm that the merges are correct. If any merge is wrong, use
Settings → Edit pile label canonical names to rename or
separate the labels. The similarity threshold is controlled by
fuzzy_label_threshold in config.txt (default
0.15; lower values are stricter).
No pile label data available.
Shown in the Edit pile label canonical names
settings screen when the current session has no pile label information.
This can happen if the project was loaded from a
CMapSession.RData file saved by an older version of RCMap.
Reload the raw CSV data (option 1 in the main menu) to rebuild the label
dictionary.
Menu screen does not clear / text accumulates.
If each menu appears below the previous one rather than on a fresh
screen, your terminal may not support the ANSI escape sequence used for
clearing. Start RCMap with RCMapMenu(clear_screen = FALSE)
to disable screen clearing and keep a scrollable history
instead.
Plots do not appear. On some systems R may need
a graphics device to be opened before plotting. Try calling
x11() (Linux), quartz() (macOS), or
windows() (Windows) at the R prompt before running
RCMapMenu().
Analysis options are greyed out. The Plots, Reports, and Analysis menus are only active after a project has been loaded (main menu option 1). If they appear dimmed, return to the main menu and load a project first.
Reproducibility. MDS jitter and split-half
randomisation both use seeds that can be set in config.txt
(mds_seed, splithalf_seed). To reproduce a
previous result exactly, ensure these values match the session in which
the original analysis was run.